The Odessa File - Frederick Forsyth
Language: EnglishKeywords: 
Frederick Forsyth
 odessa file
 The Odessa File
Shared by:kassyopeia
Written by
Read by David Rintoul
Format: MP3
Bitrate: 64 Kbps
Unabridged
Overview (Wikipedia): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Odessa_File
Review (Kirkus Reviews): https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/frederick-forsyth-9/the-odessa-file/
| Announce URL: | udp://open.demonii.com:1337/announce |
| This Torrent also has several backup trackers | |
| Tracker: | udp://open.demonii.com:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker.istole.it/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.istole.it:80/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker.publicbt.com/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.publicbt.com:80/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.leechers-paradise.org:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.coppersurfer.tk:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://explodie.org:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.desu.sh:6969 |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.tiny-vps.com:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | udp://tracker.vanitycore.co:6969/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker.baravik.org:6970/announce |
| Tracker: | http://tracker2.wasabii.com.tw:6969/announce |
| Creation Date: | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 08:31:07 -0400 |
| This is a Multifile Torrent | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 001.mp3 4.75 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 002.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 003.mp3 4.92 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 004.mp3 4.7 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 005.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 006.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 007.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 008.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 009.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 010.mp3 4.59 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 011.mp3 4.58 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 012.mp3 4.59 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 013.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 014.mp3 4.63 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 015.mp3 4.65 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 016.mp3 4.87 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 017.mp3 4.77 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 018.mp3 4.58 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 019.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 020.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 021.mp3 4.7 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 022.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 023.mp3 4.63 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 024.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 025.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 026.mp3 4.64 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 027.mp3 4.58 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 028.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 029.mp3 4.89 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 030.mp3 4.74 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 031.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 032.mp3 4.63 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 033.mp3 4.72 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 034.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 035.mp3 4.67 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 036.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 037.mp3 4.64 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 038.mp3 4.66 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 039.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 040.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 041.mp3 4.63 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 042.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 043.mp3 4.67 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 044.mp3 4.59 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 045.mp3 4.61 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 046.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 047.mp3 4.74 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 048.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 049.mp3 4.62 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 050.mp3 4.64 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 051.mp3 4.58 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 052.mp3 4.58 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 053.mp3 4.66 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 054.mp3 4.59 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 055.mp3 4.73 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 056.mp3 4.59 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 057.mp3 4.58 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 058.mp3 4.59 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 059.mp3 4.6 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 060.mp3 4.69 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 061.mp3 4.64 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 062.mp3 4.83 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 063.mp3 4.63 MBs | |
| 1972 - The Odessa File The Odessa File 064.mp3 2.53 MBs | |
| Combined File Size: | 295.21 MBs |
| Piece Size: | 128 KBs |
| Comment: | Updated by AudioBook Bay |
| Encoding: | UTF-8 |
| Info Hash: | f08d9c777d7e6374e65c876f26c2190650559e27 |
| Torrent Download | Torrent Free Downloads |
| Tips | Sometimes the torrent health info isn’t accurate, so you can download the file and check it out or try the following downloads. |
| Direct Download | Start Direct Download |
| Tips | You could try out alternative bittorrent clients. |
| Secured Download | Download Files Now |
| Ad |
|







This post has 10 comments
September 22nd, 2014
Not “historical fiction”. It was written, and set, in the 1970s.
September 22nd, 2014
Thank you, this book looks great.
Historical fiction…or not.
Most of the books listed here are jumbled up, under the wrong section and such… So I wouldn’t let the above comment bother me. ;)
Please keep posting books.:) Thanks again.
September 22nd, 2014
gesserit on KAT is going to upload many of forsyths novels over the coming period. exciting. no doubt kassyopeia will be copying them all hrer too. thanks to all involved
September 23rd, 2014
^^^ Wikipedia calls it that, and after mulling it over, I went along with it. Your objection is that it was (more or less) set in the present at the time of writing, yes? I’m thinking the label works in a slightly different sense, though - it’s fiction tied directly into significant historical goings-on, namely French colonialism for “Day of the Jackal” and the Holocaust for “Odessa File”. Admittedly, I might have come to a different decision if they were written and set more recently, though, now that I think about it. Meh. :)
^ kassyopeia being gesserit’s less current alter ego, “no doubt” indeed. :P
September 23rd, 2014
thank you for sharing
September 24th, 2014
On [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Odessa_File[/url] it’s just called a “thriller”.
I read this back in the 70s myself, and was alive in the 60s, which made the label “historical” pretty jarring to me.
Written 1972 and set 1963, not exactly “present day”, but “historical” usually refers to at least 50 years before publication. ([url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_fiction#Historical_novels[/url])
Anyway, glad you don’t take umbrage at comments. Some posters think a correction, much less a difference of opinion, is a criticism.
September 24th, 2014
^ It’s http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Jackal which calls that one a “Spy, Thriller, Historical novel”, but the books are so stylistically similar that the question transfers (in either direction), I’m thinking.
Thanks for pointing me to the “x years” definitions; I’d never come across those before, that I can recall, and find them a bit surprising in their naivete. Which isn’t to say that the figures aren’t sensible ones, mind you - 25 years is a generation, 50 years is likely before the author was grown-up, or born at all.
As I said, I tend to think of the label as much in terms of content as of setting. For example, if a story has a medieval backdrop that’s (whether deliberately for effect, or simply for lack of more detailed research) kept totally vague, I’d be hesitant to apply the “historical” label. If it’s set in a recognizable region and century and involves or at least mentions recognizable events or personages, then it falls squarely into the mold.
To be clear, though, I make no claim to that being anything more than my own idiosyncratic notion. :)
As to not taking umbrage, I’m one of those people who actually prefer constructive criticism to generic praise. To my mind, the one proves that someone genuinely cares, whereas the other may be genuine appreciation, but may also be nothing more than hollow courtesy. I’ve had discussions about that on other filesharing sites, and it’s still beyond me why anybody would want to have to wade through fifty one-word “thanks” posts to get to the one which points out a problem or makes a useful suggestion. *shakes head in bewilderment*
September 25th, 2014
Well, so in fact, no one called “Odessa” historical fiction, except you.
Most torrents here have a random collection of labels, to the point they’re completely useless for searching. And the “key words” often make some weird books come up in the “related” list on the right. So makes little difference in the end what you put.
And I see you’ve also labelled “Fourth Protocol” the same. That was written 1984, set in 1986 — the future when it was written. A future that never happened, of course. So even less “historical”.
Are you just taking the piss now?
September 25th, 2014
Taking the piss??
Does it really matter. The point, is an excellent book has been made available on a number of sites by someone who wants to share. Debate semantics all you want, but plĂ©ase don’t complain about it.
Thanks again Gesserit / Kassyopeia. We look forward to your offerings.
September 26th, 2014
No worries, as I said, I don’t mind complaints in the least.
Neither do I feel the need to explain my reasoning more than twice, though. ;)